A little collection of poetry, and some home truths.
I am hugely pleased to have a poetry pamphlet in the pipeline from Pighog Press. Due out in November, this will be my first little poetry collection - and it has the strange but “I like it so I hope you do too” working title of The Half-Life of Fathers. That is the title of a poem commissioned last year by artist Philip Hartigan for his Dia Del Padre exhibition in Chicago, and it was also given a special mention in the last Essex Poetry competition. I am looking forward to the Pighog reader’s report, then working with my editor, and talking over the cover designs. Fun!
Having said it is a little collection, I’m not sure the world of poetry really allows that word to be used when it isn’t a ‘proper book’ - pamphlets to be distinguished at all times from the proper books, I suppose? However, Pighog refers to the latter as ‘full collections’ so in that vein, I am calling this pamphlet a 'little collection'. As well as a pamphlet.
The different conventions in this poetry world take some getting used to. No-one told me, for example: If you are mainly to date a prose writer and have an agent, you do not request said agent to approach publishers of poetry, as I did because it seemed natural. Apparently, the publishers do not like it, and the poet is expected to do the contacting themselves. Why? It would be useful if some published poets/poetry presses could cast light on this one. One would have thought the slush piles are fifty times higher than prose...
Who was to know all this? But anyway - among whatever else was happening, I did approach Pighog myself because it’s local, their publications are excellent quality, I know a few of their poets, such as the brilliant Clare Best, and am grinning with pleasure to be joining their ranks. It is also a joy to be published in a limited edition of 300 copies. Why? Because there is then no pressure to sell sell sell to keep the book in print...although I will do my bit while it exists, as I have always done. Publishing any book is a partnership.
Another convention in the poetry world mirrors one that the prose world adhered to some years ago, ie: a record of online publication does not seem to be seen as much cop. This despite the rigorous editorial skills of someone like Helen Ivory, for example, who edits Ink Sweat and Tears...which makes little sense to me, but there you go. Maybe someone who knows more can explain? To be taken seriously, you need a record of quality publications in ‘proper’ magazines, to make up a strong CV. (There’s that word again - the poetry world still seems to have a strong backbone of properness - convention.) If they are thinking commercially, I'd have thought so long as you have a following, does it matter where you are read? A poem probably gets far more readings online than it does in a paper publication... no? If they are thinking purely professionally, why does another editor's previous decision to publish you strengthen their own?
So how does it work if like me, you kept most of your poetry in the depths of your hard drive, as it was something you turned to when prose didn’t fit the feelings welling up, and when written most of it was forgotten as you had no idea what to do with it? I was not, and am not, part of any poetry communities, so was not learning markets. Not out of laziness, I hope, more from a belief that I wasn't really a poet. Ah but sometimes, I’d send stuff out, when I occasionally stumbled across somewhere that looked suitable - and sometimes it would be accepted, and sometimes not, but I had no idea why in either case. Or, I’d send it to a comp I didn’t mind supporting with a fiver, as with Bridport (funds go to the Arts Centre - my stuff has been shortlisted a couple of times), or the Troubadour (funds go to support a great live event series, my stuff won a prize last year). But it was always hit n miss, no strategy, because all my strategising was going into my prose. And because of that, I suspect my poetry hasn’t done as well as it might have done, had I worked at it harder. That’s fact.
I guess the answer to that is, either you play the game by the rules, or you don’t. And there are conventions, so if you want to get anywhere, follow them. And I don’t think it is coincidence that attending some workshops with Pascale Petit and learning, learning about editing in particular, runs alongside doing a bit better, do you?
.
Huge congrats to you. I think I'll take some vicarious pride in this, too, remembering when we first started talking about your writing poetry. I might even write a little blog post about this post, if you don't mind. out have such fascinating things to say on the subject.
ReplyDeleteSue - I well remember an evening in front of the fire at Anam Cara, and you read from your work, and I loved it - and expressed some disbelief that I could ever do that... and you were amazingly encouraging. Thank you! Look forward to the poet. x
ReplyDelete"One would have thought the slush piles are fifty times higher than prose..." - I seem to recall Chris Hamilton-Emery writing that one of the myths of the poetry world is that the slush pile is worth it. Helena Nelson wrote that "it may be worth noting that poetry publishers, once established, have a constant mental list of people they’d like to work with and publications they’d like to do. ... Most publishers start to say ‘no unsolicited submissions’ simply as a way of making the workload manageable."
ReplyDelete"It is also a joy to be published in a limited edition of 300 copies" - I thought 300 was quite a big print-run nowadays.
"either you play the game by the rules, or you don’t." - For what it's worth, you're welcome to http://litrefsarticles.blogspot.co.uk/2011/10/getting-poetry-published-in-uk.html (already a bit out-dated)
If you want lists of "recurring Contemp Po features" (i.e. conventions), see http://www.happenstancepress.co.uk/index.php?option=com_easyblog&view=entry&id=258&Itemid=52 (Helena Nelson) and http://htmlgiant.com/craft-notes/moves-in-contemporary-poetry/ (Mike Young)
HI Tim, and thanks for that - I get the commissioning stuff - and I guess that's why you have to work hard to get your work into the magazines read by editors, to get a name out there. My bad - but as I said, its been a focus on fiction up to now. If they don't know your work, why should they be interested to publish you... and that's understandable. It does surprise me that eds aren't in general interested to see submissions via agents though - if you have a record of publishing fiction in addition to some poetry successes, I'd have thought that meant summat, but obviously not. A lot to learn here! And thanks for those really good links.
DeleteAgents don't represent poetry because there's no money in it (as a general rule). No advances amd negligible royalties mean that the agent's 15% is often 15% of nothing. The exception would be an author who also publishes prose, where an agent might rep their poetry too as a kind of loss-leader. The other excrption, of course, would be for those rare poets who actually make money from their poetry - but they're rare indeed.
ReplyDeleteHi Francesca - valuable points, thank you. It is your point regarding mainstream-published writers with agents (your exception) that I was exploring above. Especially, arguably, a writer who has a 'poet's novel' already out there...(according to A N Wilson). It was a surprise to find that in general, an introduction from an agent means nothing in the poetry world, whereas in prose, it does. All part of this learning curve, I guess. I was keen to state that in my post, as I have not heard any advice on this count to date.
ReplyDeleteHi Vanessa, thank you for mentioning my workshops, that's very kind, and to teach you is sheer pleasure. Congrats on the pamphlet, I'm looking forward to it very much. This is a lot to answer. When I teach my Chateau Ventenac course we usually spend some time discussing these issues. I think your track record as a novelist will have an influence on your poetry publications, at the very least it tells poetry publishers you are professional, committed and have a readership.Very few poets have agents, as others have said, because there's no money in it. It's not a financial transaction in most cases, apart that is from the publisher taking the very real risk of losing money. Many collections sell under 50 copies! Even when collections sell a few thousand copies there's not much royalties, compared to novels. About online magazines not being as valuable at the moment for a CV - I imagine that's for a number of reasons. Partly, it IS happening, but not yet, so Helen Ivory's excellent mag is a fairly new thing. I'm sure this situation will change as online magazines are growing in number and quality. Then there's the aspect of publishers talent scouting: it's quicker for them to be sent free issues of paper magazines, to browse through for emerging poets they find exciting than for them to spend days trawling the web. Again, I expect this is changing. Just a few thoughts! The track record is essential to show a poet is building a readersship and has served an apprenticeship, and their poems have been scrutinised by editors whose opinion publishers might respect. To compare Poetry London with Ink, Sweat and Tears: It's much harder to get in to PL because there is less space for poems per year, therefore the editor (speaking from experience) may have spent more time agonising over poesm they are considering publishing. Competition wins are another thing altogether, and just as valuable for the CV if not more, and your poem that won the Troubadour prize is extraordinary. I don't suppose that has gone unnoticed! Px
ReplyDeleteHi Pascale - and thank you for such an informative comment! And for your sweet words about the Troubadour poem.
DeleteJust to let you know, Immensi tremor oceani was written in late August, immediately after the Ty Newydd course with you and Daljit. I was shocked to hear of the death of a friend in Ireland, also a poet, and writing a poem seemed the only place to go to salve the real sadness. That's what I mean by, 'I turn to poetry when prose doesn't fit' - ie, 'feel right' or 'help' or whatever else. But obviously my subconscious was full of your recent help and advice and the new learning I'd just done - so... thank you! x
Hi Vanessa,
ReplyDeleteAn interesting post, thank you. Congratulations of your publication, it must be very exciting. I have just started attempting to write poetry myself. I am studying a Creative Writing course with the OU and otherwise I may well have avoided it. I have had a bit of a fear of writing poetry. I still haven't quite got over that, writing this way makes me feel rather naked. But I am enjoying it. I was also delighted that you mentioned Clare Best. She is my tutor and I am looking forward to a day school on poetry with her on Saturday. It seems I shall be in very good hands. All the very best for your pamphlet. Shelley x
Thank you Shelley - and yes, it is very exciting - I am so pleased.
DeleteI know exactly what you mean about the fear of writing poetry though, and also the feeling that you are far more 'naked' as a writer in your poetry - at least that's how it feels. But then, maybe that means it is truer as well. Look at Clare's collections 'Excisions' and 'Breastless' - absolutely heartstoppingly 'true', aren't they? You are very lucky to have Clare as a tutor. Enjoy it all.
(By the way, did you leave a question for the Bridport blog?? If so, the reply has gone up on the Bridport website ...!)
That's great. Thank you Vanessa, I shall go and have a peek. x
DeleteRe why agents don't bother - in "Mapping contemporary poetry"
ReplyDeletehttp://www.literaturedevelopment.co.uk/domains/nationalassociationforliteraturedevelopment.org.uk/local/media/audio/Poetry_mapping_DEFINITIVE.pdf
they list the 100 most profitable books by "contemporary" "UK" poets. Eliot, Duffy, Armitage, Cope, Hughes and Larkin dominate the top 50 (I think only Paul McCartney, Plath and Astley break the domination). After the top 50, sales are in four figures - e.g. Don Paterson's "Landing Light" (67th in the charts) sold 4258 copies (libraries, etc).
"Publishing a book of verse is like dropping a rose petal in the Grand Canyon and waiting for the echo" (Don Marquis)
HI Tim - it seems really irrelevant, doesn't it, to count how many, far more in poetry than in prose. Maybe the words poetry and commercial and viability do not sit easily in the same sentence. I have no idea why I write poetry... apart from the fact then when it comes right, it feels as though someone else wrote it - and I like that. Im certainly not in the business of literary fiction to make money! The Coward's Tale, 6 years of hard work, is selling for 1p on Amazon... I believe some of my royalties are calculated on that sales price :)
DeleteAnd I love that Grand canyon quote!
DeleteOh my, ditto on everything I find confusing and bemusing about the poetry world! But your first pamphlet is a brilliant first foray into it, good luck brave explorer, it's like another country, isn't it? I do sometimes feel it is designed to keep non-poets out, but perhaps that's my fear and paranoia. That said, I am loving reading more and more poetry this year, so it's good to separate the joy of the writing from the oddness of the "biz", isn't it?
ReplyDeleteHard hat at the ready... armour-plated underwear and flame gun...(yes it is odd, but hey, it wouldn't be fun if it wasn't...)
DeleteTania and Vanessa,
ReplyDeleteI have to agree with you that there is an element of the poetry world that looks forbidding to the non-poet, but it shouldnt be like that, nor should poems. I do hope that changes. It's a small world so perhaps this contributes to the feeling that it's a family. Conversely, as a poet who has almost finished writing a novel, I am so petrified of the whole novel scene and idea of a novel (where I feel more exposed because yes it is fictionalised autobiography) that I feel frozen at a standstill. I have diverted myself into a companion poetry collection to it for now, which feels so much safer!
Hi Pascale, many congratulations on the 'almost finishing' of the novel. Chapeau!
ReplyDeleteIf it helps at all, I feel frozen with mine most of the time, but I wont let it beat me into submission. Mind you it is not autobiographical at all - and I can imagine you would feel very naked, having written like that. I will lend you my armour plating, for the Q and As after reading events!
x